Special Features

Image Libraries

Blog

“We taught our kids how to ride their bikes on the trail… If they swerved into a train …”

“I think the question is: Are there alternatives that will give us transit options but also preserve the trail, which is a great resource for our region.”

“The students said their track team, and other athletic teams throughout Bethesda and Chevy Chase, use the trail for practice runs – and for walking to school. “We’ll probably have to drive to school” if light rail is built, said [one student]”

Purple line opponents staged a march last weekend along a portion of the rail right-of-way. As the quotes above illustrate, the propaganda brigade was in full force, and in particularly misleading form.

Responding, in reverse order:

  • With light rail, the trail will still exist and will still be perfectly usable for track team practice. Building transit does not mean the trail will go away. They will be adjacent to each other.
  • Yes, transit options that preserve the trail do exist, but the Jones Bridge Road alignment isn’t one of them, and opponents are even less interested in seeing those options built than the trail alignment.
  • Cross sections show that on the master plan alignment there will be fences between trains and trail to stop anyone on a bike from swerving into a train. The cross sections also show that there will be no such fences on the Jones Bridge Road alignment.

With every event staged, Purple line opponents expose themselves more and more as mere NIMBYs. How much longer are we supposed to take them seriously?

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 288 user reviews.

June 4th, 2008 | Permalink
Tags: transportation



Media

   
   



Site
About BeyondDC
Archive 2003-06
Contact

Search:

GoogleBeyondDC
Category Tags:

Partners
 
  Greater Greater Washington
 
  Washington Post All Opinions Are Local Blog
 
  Denver Urbanism
 
  Streetsblog Network



BeyondDC v. 2013d | Email | Archive of posts from 2003-2006