Special Features

Image Libraries

Blog

The ICC at Route 29

Federal officials Monday night gave final approval to the ICC, the new interstate highway connecting Gaithersburg and Laurel. Within hours, Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich broke ground near Shady Grove, and construction will begin in earnest this fall.

Our position at BeyondDC pretty much mirrors Montgomery County Executive Doug Duncan’s. Originally a supporter of the road, Duncan responded to the groundbreaking by saying “They have gutted the state dedicated transportation fund, cut transit and left future generations of Maryland to deal with the consequences. We must not be lulled into the belief that one road alone will solve our transportation challenges.” On its own merits, the ICC isn’t a bad highway, as highways go. It will densify parts of Montgomery County that long ago suburbanized, while diverting growth from still-rural parts of the I-270 corridor. It will make possible more commercial activity in the eastern part of the metropolitan area, making it more competitive with the west. It will better link suburban Maryland with Baltimore, theoretically helping to reinforce economic health in the latter.

The problem is that it all comes at a cost. Coming in at over $130 million per mile, the Maryland DOT has been fervently cutting transit projects around the state to pay for its new highway. The Corridor Cities and Bi-County Transitways are both likely to be downgraded to bus routes instead of rail. The CCT is being routed around walkable neighborhoods instead of through them because it’s cheaper, while one option for the BCT eliminates even the rapid part of Bus Rapid Transit, leaving the corridor with a simple surface bus. Baltimore’s grand rail plan was rewritten to favor buses, and the one new line undergoing active study (there is another extension in the works as well) is being pushed as a BRT corridor, with locally preferred subway off the table completely. In all cases the transit corridors are progressing slowly, if at all. It would be political suicide to cut them altogether, but with attention focused squarely on the ICC, MDOT has quietly put transit on the back burner. They’re not cancelled; they’re simply not being advanced.

If money were not an issue, we would like the ICC. But if building the ICC means no new transit (or just as bad: ineffective transit) in Maryland for a generation, it’s just not going to be worth it.

Average Rating: 4.5 out of 5 based on 258 user reviews.

May 31st, 2006 | Permalink
Tags: transportation



One of the primary reasons housing is so expensive is that many of the forms that were historically affordable are no longer built. For example, accessory apartments on properties with other primary uses, such as granny flats and above-shop residences, once provided much of the affordable housing supply but are now illegal in most jurisdictions due to exclusionary zoning practices favoring lower density and/or suburban style development. We still build lots of apartments, but new buildings constructed by developers are necessarily “luxury” for the first years of their lifespan and do not much help the affordability problem.

Another such form is the alleyhouse – homes that front on alleys rather than streets. They may be accessory on a larger property or may sit on their own parcel, but according to articles on WTOP and the Post, whether attached or detached they’re making a comeback in DC. Of course, the basic rules of supply and demand still apply. There still isn’t enough supply to meet the demand for housing, so even alleyhouses in the District are expensive, but certainly less so than regular homes, and imagine the difference it would make if the Washington region as a whole became more friendly towards this type of dwelling.

Average Rating: 4.5 out of 5 based on 166 user reviews.

May 30th, 2006 | Permalink
Tags: development, law



Around Christmas BeyondDC snapped a quick set of about 20 late-night photos around our home neighborhood in Arlington. Take a look.


Ballston as seen from Quincy Park.

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 176 user reviews.

May 26th, 2006 | Permalink
Tags: galleries



That was the question posed by one Warren Quenstedt during the early planning of rapid transit in Washington. He meant, in the words of Zachary Schrag, that a “good transportation system doesn’t simply move people from one place to another – it also shapes the places it serves”. Schrag, author of The Great Society Subway, a very fine history of the Metrorail system, contends in his recent Post editorial that today’s Washingtonia, from Chinatown to Ballston, owes a large part of its success and urbanity to Metro’s existence, and that had highways been built instead of subways we would live in a very different metropolis indeed. Schrag notes “today’s Washingtonians are the beneficiaries of a vision that was fought for and put into motion a generation ago. If they are grateful, they will repay the favor by laying more groundwork for the next generation.”

The editorial is well worth a read, as is his book.

Thanks to Richard Layman for the heads up on this one.

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 270 user reviews.

May 9th, 2006 | Permalink
Tags: transportation



The White Flint Crossing project that was approved yesterday by planners will include a 24-story, 289-foot-tall building that will eclipse by 13 feet Gaithersburg’s Washingtonian Tower, becoming the tallest skyscraper in the Maryland suburbs. According to architects, the new building (pictured at right) is intended to create a “dramatic and distinctive signature on the skyline”. BeyondDC thinks it’s a little boxy and perhaps a bit too wide for its height, but we like the verticality of the façade. The crown is something of a quesetion mark. If built with the right material and illuminated properly at night, it could very well become the beacon planners and architects hope.

For more information visit the staff report (pdf).

Update: Additional information and renderings – including the three shown below – are available at the project web site. This second batch of images show a substantially different tower than the first. BeyondDC doesen’t know which is closer to what will actually be built. May 10, 2006

Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 300 user reviews.

May 5th, 2006 | Permalink
Tags: architecture, development



Media

   
   



Site
About BeyondDC
Archive 2003-06
Contact

Search:

GoogleBeyondDC
Category Tags:

Partners
 
  Greater Greater Washington
 
  Washington Post All Opinions Are Local Blog
 
  Denver Urbanism
 
  Streetsblog Network



BeyondDC v. 2013d | Email | Archive of posts from 2003-2006