Special Features

Image Libraries

Blog
Logan Circle is now DC’s densest neighborhood

click to enlarge

click to enlarge
DC area density by census tract, in 2000 (top) and 2010 (bottom). Top image from US Census FactFinder. Bottom from Michael Rodriguez.

Density is a good thing for urbanism. More density means more shops and amenities nearby, better transit service, and shorter walks. But what qualifies as dense? Overall city density is often reported, but a more telling statistic is neighborhood density.

The two maps at right show DC neighborhood density at the time of the 2000 census (top) and 2010 census (bottom). I made the 2000 map using census.gov sometime after the 2000 census. Michael Rodriguez created the bottom map just recently. Unfortunately the two maps use different scales, but they’re still informative.

In 2000 the densest census tract in the DC region was in northern Columbia Heights, between Spring Road and Newton Street. It had 57,317 people per square mile (ppsm).

In 2010 that tract is up to 59,209 ppsm, but that’s only good enough for 2nd place in DC, and 3rd regionally.

The densest tract is now southern Logan Circle, between Rhode Island and Massachusetts Avenues. It’s boomed and is now a whopping 67,149 ppsm.

The rest of central Northwest, from Mount Pleasant down to Massachusetts Avenue, varies from around 30,000-50,000 ppsm. Capitol Hill is in the 20,000-30,000 ppsm range.

Meanwhile, in Alexandria, the tract at the corner of I-395 and Seminary Road is up to 59,886 ppsm, 2nd densest in the region after Logan Circle. There hasn’t been any new development in that tract since 2000, but the suburban-style apartment towers in it may have fewer singles and more families, which could account for the increase. Crystal City is 45,448 ppsm, and Ballston is 43,788 ppsm.

Suburban Maryland’s densest tract is in Langley Park, at 49,354 ppsm. Downtown Silver Spring is 34,816 ppsm, and downtown Bethesda is around 11,000 ppsm.

March 19th, 2013 | Permalink | {num}Comments
Tags: demographics, history, maps

  • ballston guy

    it would be nice if we could get a bigger version of the 2000 map

    • BeyondDC

      Unfortunately I don’t have it any bigger. It might be possible to recreate it using census.gov, but I don’t know.

  • Josh

    “Overall city density is often reported, but a more telling statistic is neighborhood density.”nn^This. I think DC has it particularly bad because there are whole areas that are just dead zones. You can see on the map how Massachusetts Avenue is almost a hard line between super dense and not at all. At least they’re starting to build some mixed use stuff downtown. Maybe the million dollar condos in “City Center” will ease some of the pressure in Logan.

  • C_29

    People live in Crystal City?



Media

   
   



Site
About BeyondDC
Archive 2003-06
Contact

Search:

GoogleBeyondDC
Category Tags:

Partners
 
  Greater Greater Washington
 
  Washington Post All Opinions Are Local Blog
 
  Denver Urbanism
 
  Streetsblog Network



BeyondDC v. 2013d | Email | Archive of posts from 2003-2006